So, the recent article from Popsci enttiled “What Is the Point of the Female Orgasm?” is trying to suggest that there may be no rhyme or reason to the female orgasm. They give an overly lengthy debate on whether a woman cumming is the by product of a male orgasm or if it functions as a adaptive evolutionary one.
This new study is trying to convince the world of the first argument – that there is no evolutionary evidence to explain a female orgasm. To them I say, suck a cock. As a women I cannot believe that we only orgasm because a man does. Women are just as much of a sexual being as a man, if not more so by our ability to give life.
What about the scientific evidence to that shows how the cervix sucks up the sperm when a woman is cumming, therefore, increasing her fertility chances. This is the basis for Karma Sutra in India. They want to make sex as pleasurable for the woman as it is for the man to ensure orgasm and increase fertility.
Also, at least in my reasoning, the more chance for orgasm, the more reason to even have sex. I know that the more I cum, the more I want to have sex. This is the same theory for a man. Why else would a guy want to fuck? Our bodies give us the physical payoff to ensure that we continue having sex and there continues the whole goddamn human race.
Why do you think ladies choose not to continually fuck somebody who’s bad in bed? They want a partner that will satisfy them, which will in turn spread his seed over the guy who sucks in the sack. It’s all about survival of the fittest and the female orgasm gets to be the judge and jury.
It seems to me this is a debate full of why why why. When really we should be focusing on how how how. Why do they care why we orgasm? They should be focusing on how to make us orgasm because I know a lot of guys that could use a brush up lesson or two.